Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

320 F. App'x 170

Cooper v. Hamidullah

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided April 6, 2009

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2009-04-06

Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics

Decided 2009-04-06

¶1Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

¶2Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

¶3Eugene Cooper appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court. See Cooper v. Hamidullah, No. 4:07-cv-00113-TLW, 2008 WL 906704 (D.S.C. Mar. 31, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶4AFFIRMED.

/320/fappx/170 · .json · Public domain