Miller v. Richardson’s Empirical Analysis
1970
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 402 (§ 202 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Thomas v. Celebrezze · Underwood v. Ribicoff · Celebrezze v. Bolas · Miracle v. Celebrezze · Snyder v. Ribicoff
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is apparent that the purpose of the full-time student provision of Section 202(d) of the Act [ 42 U.S.C. § 402 (d)] is to help defray the expenses of those students attending edueational institutions on a full-time basis. Miller v. Richardson, 320 F.Supp. 313, 316 (S.D.W.Va.1970).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Elam v. Hanson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.