Williams v. Brasea, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1970
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 1997
3 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · United States v. Louisiana · United States v. Florida · Eyerly Aircraft Co. v. Jack Killian, Individually and for and on Behalf of Jan Killian, a Minor · Hearne v. Dow-Badische Chemical Company
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the nature and character of the business; (2) the number and type of activities within the forum; (3) Whether such activities give rise to the cause of action; (4) whether the forum has some special interest in granting relief; and (5) the relative convenience of the parties.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““rather than the place where the injury actually occurred, which should be determinative on the question of Bender’s amenability to process.” Brasea, supra, at 659 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.