Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 320 GAAPP 275 - Brinkley v. State

Brinkley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
November 2020
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Barker v. Wingo · Garza v. State · Chatman v. Mancill

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]o assess claims involving appellate delay, we use an analysis based on ... length of delay, the reason for the delay, the defendant's assertion of his right, and prejudice to the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “there can be no prejudice in delaying a meritless [motion for new trial or] appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.