Cosmo v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
October 2014
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Cargile v. State · Gregoroff v. State · 298 Ga. App. 538 - Frix v. State · 309 Ga. App. 95 - Logan v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It shall be unlawful for any person intentionally or willfully to utilize a computer on-line service or Internet service, including but not limited to a local bulletin board service, Internet chat room, e-mail, on-line messaging service, or other electronic device, to seduce, solicit, lure, or entice, or attempt to seduce, solicit, lure, or entice a child or another person believed by such person to be a child to commit any illegal act described in Code Section 16-6-2, relating to the offense of sodomy or aggravated sodomy; Code Section 16-6-4, relating to the offense of child molestation or aggravated child molestation; Code Section 16-6-5, relating to the offense of enticing a child for indecent purposes; or Code Section 16-6-8, relating to the offense ofpublic indecency or to engage in any conduct that by its nature is an unlawful sexual offense against a child. 2”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Cosmo · Young v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.