Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 320 GAAPP 404 - Carter v. Scott

Carter v. Scott’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Hall · 185 Ga. App. 377 - State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Morgan · 219 Ga. App. 646 - Martin v. Gaither · 189 Ga. App. 460 - Fagan v. Atnalta, Inc. · 299 Ga. App. 280 - GEICO General Insurance Co. v. Wright

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. A de novo standard of review applies to an appeal from a [grant or] denial of summary judgment, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “it is well settled that an adult of ordinary intelligence assumes the risk of possible injury when [she] deliberately and voluntarily joins in a fight, or enters into a fight for the purpose of breaking it up.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.