Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 320 GAAPP 646 - Seitman v. State

Seitman v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
April 2021
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Balbosa v. State · 299 Ga. App. 368 - Jacobs v. State · 256 Ga. App. 436 - Whitaker v. State · 294 Ga. App. 169 - Jones v. State · 287 Ga. App. 783 - Davis v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A criminal defendant must personally and intelligently participate in the waiver of the constitutional right to a trial by jury. When the purported waiver of this right is questioned, the State bears the burden of showing that the waiver was made both intelligently and knowingly, either (1) by showing on the record that the defendant was cognizant of the right being waived; or (2) by filling a silent or incomplete record through the use of extrinsic evidence which affirmatively shows that the waiver was knowingly and voluntarily made.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Although Georgia appellate courts have often noted that it would be preferable to have defendant's personal participation spread on the record in open court, to forestall subsequent claims of lack of participation or an intelligent or knowing waiver, nonetheless, there is no legal precedent requiring an in-court waiver of the right of a jury trial.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The question of whether a defendant is capable or incapable of making a knowing and intelligent waiver of his rights is to be answered by the trial judge and will be accepted by this court unless such determination is clearly erroneous.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.