Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 320 GAAPP 838 - Bryant v. State

Bryant v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
September 2016
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · 285 Ga. App. 545 - Drammeh v. State · Hodges v. State · 273 Ga. App. 850 - Copeland v. State · Jackson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an indictment not only charges the defendant with the specified crime, it also embraces all lesser included offenses of the charged offense. An indictment places an accused on notice that he can be convicted of the crimes expressly charged as well as lesser crimes that are included in the charged offenses as a matter of law or fact. Indeed, if an offense is a lesser included offense as a matter of law or fact, an accused can be convicted of that offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “On appeal from a criminal conviction, the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to support the verdict, and the defendant no longer enjoys a presumption of innocence. We determine only whether the evidence authorized the jury to find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, and in doing so we neither weigh the evidence nor judge the credibility of witnesses.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.