Pineo v. White’s Empirical Analysis
1946
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 2 district · 66 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 96 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably Simon v. Solomon (1982), O'Sullivan v. Shaw (2000)
10 federal appellate · 2 district · 66 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bernatavicius v. Bernatavicius · Pearson v. Mulloney · Pray v. Stebbins · Voigt v. Voigt · Raptes v. Pappas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 96 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]e should not interpret a statute 'as effecting a material change in or a repeal of the common law unless the intent to do so is clearly expressed.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.