Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 320 Mich. 25 - Taylor v. Burdick

Taylor v. Burdick’s Empirical Analysis

1948

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
January 2017
most recently cited

6 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently January 2017

6 federal appellate ·

7019481950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Endres v. Mara-Rickenbacker Co. · Kimber v. Eding · Reh v. Ertrachter · Schomberg v. Bayly · Noorthoek v. Preferred Automobile Ins.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to protect the public against fraud and imposition in transactions involving the titles of motor vehicles, and to discourage larceny and unlawful disposition of such vehicles.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.