Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 320 N.C. 596 - State v. Bolinger

State v. Bolinger’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

52 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably 167 N.C. App. 582 - State v. Carter (2004), 163 N.C. App. 191 - State v. Rhodes (2004)

52 state decisions

2201987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Alford · State v. Ahearn · 58 N.C. App. 330 - State v. Davis · State v. Parker · State v. Clark

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[d]efendant may obtain appellate review of this issue only upon grant of a writ of certiorari.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Except as provided in subsection (al) of this section and G.S. 15A-979, and except when a motion to withdraw a plea of guilty or no contest has been denied, the defendant is not entitled to appellate review as a matter of right when he has entered a plea of guilty or no contest to a criminal charge in the superior court.....”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “while most pleas of guilty consist of both a waiver of trial and an express admission of guilt, the latter element is not a constitutional requisite to the imposition of criminal penalty. An individual accused of crime may voluntarily, knowingly, and understandingly consent to the imposition of a prison sentence even if he is unwilling or unable to admit his participation in the acts constituting the crime.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.