Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 320 N.W.2d 82 - State v. Nading

State v. Nading’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
June 2007
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 2007

7 state decisions

30198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. Chestnut · State v. Lee · State v. Seefeldt · State v. Compton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We believe that the officers acted reasonably in requiring defendant and Williams to lie on the ground during the time their identified and suspicious conduct were being investigated.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the officers had strong grounds for suspecting that the men in the van and the Blazer were burglars who may well have committed another crime”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.