State v. Hoskinson’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 district · 10 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"[A]n officer may conduct a further protective search if he or she develops a reasonable suspicion, based on specific and articulable facts, that the person in custody poses a serious threat of harm or escape and that a search would lessen or eliminate that threat." 320 Or. at 87, 879 P.2d 180 .”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 133 Or. App. 265 - State v. Lumpkin · 161 Or. App. 179 - State v. Cocke

2. “"the officer * * * testified that he searched defendant's wallet because it was his `normal practice' to do so. Indeed, in this case, the officer testified affirmatively that he had no specific reason to believe that defendant's wallet contained either a weapon or a means of escape." 320 Or. at 87, 879 P.2d 180 . (Emphasis in original.)”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 133 Or. App. 265 - State v. Lumpkin

3. “[i]t is not tenable to suggest that the mere fact that defendant carried a wallet gave the officer reasonable, articulable suspicion that defendant posed a threat of serious physical harm or a threat of escape.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 161 Or. App. 179 - State v. Cocke