State v. M. L. B.

                               644

   This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion
    pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited
         except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).
              Submitted May 26, affirmed June 29, 2022


                In the Matter of M. L. B.,
         a Person Alleged to have Mental Illness.
                  STATE OF OREGON,
                       Respondent,
                            v.
                        M. L. B.,
                        Appellant.
             Deschutes County Circuit Court
                  21CC03802; A176506


  Owyhee Weikel-Magden, Judge pro tempore.
   Joseph R. DeBin and Multnomah Defenders, Inc. filed
the brief for appellant.
   Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman,
Solicitor General, and Eric Seepe, Assistant Attorney
General, filed the brief for respondent.
  Before James, Presiding Judge, and Joyce, Judge, and
Hadlock, Judge pro tempore.
  JOYCE, J.
  Affirmed.
Nonprecedential Memo Op: 

 (2022)           645

        JOYCE, J.
         Appellant seeks reversal of an order committing
her to the custody of the Oregon Health Authority for up to
180 days. Appellant argues that the evidence in the record
is insufficient to establish that, because of a mental disorder, she is dangerous to others. See ORS 426.130(1)(a);
ORS 426.005(1)(f)(A). Neither party has requested that
we review this matter de novo, and we conclude that this
is not an “exceptional” case that warrants de novo review.
See ORAP 5.40(8)(C). We thus defer to the trial court’s findings of fact if there is any evidence in the record to support
them and review the court’s legal conclusions for legal error.
State v. B. B., 

, 

 (2010). We
have reviewed the record and based on appellant’s pattern
of aggressive behavior leading up to the commitment hearing, we conclude that the trial court did not err in finding
that appellant was a danger to others.
        Affirmed.