Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 320 P.3d 696 - State v. Stidham

State v. Stidham’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Cuyler v. Sullivan · Mickens v. Taylor · State v. Templin · State v. James

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We review the trial court's application of the law to the facts under a correctness standard. If there are factual findings to review, we will not set them aside unless they are clearly erroneous.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “When reviewing a trial court's ruling on ineffective assistance of counsel claims, we utilize a mixed standard of review.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The denial of a motion for a new trial is reviewed under an abuse of discretion standard.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.