Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 320 S.C. 236 - MacK v. Edens

MacK v. Edens’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
July 2013
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently July 2013

12 state decisions

70199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of Greenville · Snow v. City of Columbia · Horry County v. Laychur · Whisenant v. James Island Corporation · Helsel v. City of North Myrtle Beach

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Nevertheless, dedication is an exceptional mode of passing an interest in land, and proof of dedication must be strict, cogent, and convincing. The acts proved must not be consistent with any construction other than that of a dedication, and dedication may not be implied from the permissive, sporadic, and recreational use of property. The record must contain evidence the owner of the property clearly, convincingly, or unequivocally intended to dedicate the property for public use.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.