Garrett v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
December 2005
most recently cited
3 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Wade · Cummings v. State · Wood v. State · State v. Sidell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`It is well settled in this State that this Court has no jurisdiction to disturb, because of alleged excessiveness, a sentence which is within the limits prescribed by statute unless: (a) the statute itself violates the constitutional injunction, Article I, Sec. 19, against cruel and unusual punishment, or (b) the sentence is the result of partiality, prejudice or pressure or corrupt motive.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Brouwer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.