Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 320 U.S. 383 - State of Colorado v. State of Kansas

State of Colorado v. State of Kansas’s Empirical Analysis

320 U.S. 383 · 1943

Citation profile

95
cited by 95 later decisions
37
cited 37 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 95 later decisions (37 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2018 · most notably Maryland v. Louisiana (1981), State of Georgia v. Pennsylvania R Co (1945)

22 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

37019431950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State of Kansas v. State of Colorado · State of Missouri v. State of Illinois · State of Connecticut v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts · Hinderlider v. La Plata River & Cherry Creek Ditch Co. · People of State of New Yrok v. State of New Jersey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 95 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A]ll of the factors which create equities in favor of one State or the other must be weighed as of the date when the controversy is mooted,”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “involve the interests of quasi-sovereigns, present complicated and delicate questions, and ... necessitate expert administration.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““Under the common law of Kansas, a riparian owner is entitled to reasonable use of waters of a stream for irrigation, but such use is subject to rights of other riparian owners to a like reasonable use. “Under the common law of Kansas, what is a reasonable use of waters of a stream for irrigation by riparian proprietor must, in each instance, be determined in the light of total supply and total need of all riparian proprietors.” (U 6, 7.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.