Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 321 A.2d 512 - State v. Esham

State v. Esham’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
4
states following
April 2003
most recently cited

1 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently April 2003

1 district · 8 state decisions

601974198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Heitter · Cherry v. State · Redden v. State · 8 Ill. App. 3d 606 - People v. Bellamy · Jones v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “referred to one particular set of actions occurring on only the one occasion. Id. The Delaware court also took note of the fact that judicial interpretation of the phrase,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “when the same conduct of a defendant may establish the commission of more than one offense, the defendant may be prosecuted for each offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.