Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

321 Ark. 282

Brown v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 3, 1995

Supreme Court of Arkansas · decided 1995-07-03

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently September 1998

8 state decisions

Relies on Rogers v. State · Kelly v. Kelly · In Re Thoma

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1995-07-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1Johnny R. Brown, by his attorney, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk. His attorney, Howard M. Holthoff, states by motion that he timely tendered the transcript on its due date, June 7, 1995, and that thereafter, he was notified the transcript could not be filed because the notice of appeal was filed prior to the judgment. The notice of appeal was filed of record on November 7, 1994, at 11:50 a.m., while the judgment was entered of record November 7,1994, at 2:00 p.m. Thus, the notice of appeal was of no effect. Ark. R. App. P. 4; Woods v. State, 316 Ark. 705, 873 S.W.2d 562 (1994) (per curiam); Kelly v. Kelly, 310 Ark. 244, 835 S.W.2d 869 (1992).

¶2 Attorney for appellant, by motion, admits responsibility for filing the notice of appeal prematurely. Consequently, we treat this motion as a motion for belated appeal. We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion pursuant to Ark. R. Crim. P. 36.9. J.B. Whitley v. State, 317 Ark. 647, 882 S.W.2d 670 (1994) (per curiam); see In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam). Therefore, we grant the motion for belated appeal and direct that a copy of this opinion be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

/321/ark/282 · .json · Public domain