MacK v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently February 2020 · most notably Ferguson v. State (2000), Morgan v. State (1998)
27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Collins v. State · Brawley v. State · Hufford v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“delays caused by its operations would not be subject to the same level of scrutiny as delays caused by the criminal justice system itself.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[T]he trial court ruled that the time was tolled while Mack’s competency was being determined. Mack’s counsel did not contest this ruling in any form or fashion. That was the time to raise the issue, and the trial court was entirely correct in alluding to this lapse when it denied the motion to dismiss at the subsequent omnibus hearing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dean v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.