State v. Beall’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2008
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Edwards · City of Springfield v. Monday · State v. Spear & Boyce · State v. Bickerstaff · Burrow v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Rule 36.10(a) contemplates that there will be a subsequent final disposition of the case. The rule provides that the State must certify that the interlocutory appeal is not taken for purposes of delay of the case and that the pretrial ruling substantially prejudices the prosecution of the case. Further, the rule provides that the trial court shall stay the case pending determination of the appeal. If the appellate court reverses the pretrial order appealed, the stay is to be dissolved and the case is to proceed to trial. However, if the appellate court sustains the order appealed, further proceedings are barred on the charge. These certifications and stay order necessarily refer to a pending case. Thus, the State cannot perfect an interlocutory appeal after it has dismissed the case.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. C.W. · State v. CW“an attempted appeal from a dismissed case is not an interlocutory appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. CW“an opinion on an issue which is purely abstract in nature.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. CW
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.