Ball v. A.O. Smith Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 11 U.S.C. § 523 · 11 U.S.C. § 541 · 28 U.S.C. § 1927
Relies on Grogan v. Garner · Crysen/Montenay Energy Co. v. Esselen Associates, Inc. · Arochem Corporation Na v. M Coan · State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Inversiones Errazuriz Limitada · Manley v. Ambase Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“) (quoting Cheng v. GAF Corp. , 631 F.2d 1052 , 1055 (2d Cir. 1980), vacated on other grounds , 450 U.S. 903 , 101 S.Ct. 1338 , 67 L.Ed.2d 327 (1981) ).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.