Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 321 F.2d 140 - Rua v. United States

Rua v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

321 F.2d 140 · 1963

Citation profile

75
cited by 75 later decisions
3
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

33 federal appellate · 41 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 75 later decisions — most recently March 2017 · most notably 368 So. 2d 871 - Cumbo v. State (1978), Odom v. United States (1967)

33 federal appellate · 41 state decisions

200196319701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 472

Relies on Dunn v. United States · Hagner v. United States · United States v. Debrow · Smith v. United States · Williams v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We are required to uphold the verdict if there is any theory of the evidence on which the jury could properly have reached the verdict . . . We are not called upon to speculate as to the grounds upon which the jury proceeded . . . We must assume that the jury’s verdict rests upon a finding of fact which will sustain the verdict where, as here, the record discloses that there is evidence which would support such a finding.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““That the verdict may have been the result of compromise, or of a mistake on the part of the jury, is possible. But verdicts cannot be upset by speculation or inquiry into such matters.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.