Pedro A. Mattei v. V/o Prodintorg, Libellant’s Empirical Analysis
321 F.2d 180 · 1963
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently January 2012
5 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kline v. Burke Construction Co. · Princess Lida of Thurn & Taxis v. Thompson · Waterman v. Canal-Louisiana Bank & Trust Co. · Penn General Casualty Co v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Schnader · Covell v. Heyman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] state court may properly adjudicate rights in property in the possession of a federal court and . . . the same procedure may be followed by a federal court with respect to property in the possession of a state court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.