Edwards v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
321 F.2d 324 · 1963
Citation profile
20 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently September 1982
20 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 4411 · 26 U.S.C. § 7201 · 26 U.S.C. § 7203
Relies on Holland v. United States · Spies v. United States · United States v. Murdock · Ingram v. United States · Bryan v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Q. Is it your testimony here today that you have never engaged in the bolita business ? “A. That’s right. “Q. Ever; is that correct? “A. (No response.) “Q. Is that your testimony today, Mr. Edwards ? “A. I am trying to think back. “Q. You are under oath, and I want you to take your time and reflect. “A. Yes. Back in ’49, I think it was. “Q. You were in the bolita business? “A. I got arrested. “Q. You were here in the Courtroom and heard various witnesses testify that you were delivered sacks of I don’t know what. What is your statement with respect to those sacks that they discussed as being delivered to you by various people? “A. My s tatement is that I didn’t receive any sacks from no one.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.