Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 321 F.2d 441 - Danielson v. United States

Danielson v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

321 F.2d 441 · 1963

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
July 2001
most recently cited

23 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently July 2001

23 federal appellate ·

12019631970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 495 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Stirone v. United States · Braverman v. United States · Wong Tai v. United States · Ingram v. United States · Prussian v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it is well settled that at least that degree of criminal intent necessary under the substantive offense must be proved to sustain a conviction of conspiracy to commit that offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.