Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

321 F.2d 52

Docket No. 7327.

Smith v. Taylor

Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1963-06-26

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1963

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1963-06-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

John J. Mullins, Jr., Denver, Colo., for appellant.

Benjamin E. Franklin, Asst. U. S. Atty. (Newell A. George, U. S. Atty., was with him on the brief), for appellee.

Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and SETH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

This is an appeal from an order denying an application for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner alleges no facts whatever showing he is entitled to discharge from custody. Apparently what he really seeks is certain documents from the trial court. For that habeas corpus is not an appropriate remedy.

¶2

Affirmed.

/321/f2d/52 · .json · Public domain