United States v. Ross’s Empirical Analysis
321 F.2d 61 · 1963
Citation profile
102 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 118 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2021 · most notably United States v. Park (1975), United States v. James (1979)
102 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 77Q (§ 17 of the Securities Act of 1933)
Relies on Pereira v. United States · Lutwak v. United States · Arizona v. California · Magenau v. Aetna Freight Lines, Inc. · United States v. Agueci
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 118 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“ ‘[W]e should hardly be warranted in reversing for the admission of evidence simply because the judge did not place his ruling on the ground that would most readily have supported it.’ ”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a `scheme' involves some connotation of planning and pattern * * *.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“not as high as the amount needed to warrant submission of a conspiracy charge to the jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.