Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 321 F.2d 767 - Prairie Band of Pottawatomie Tribe of Indians v. Puckkee

Prairie Band of Pottawatomie Tribe of Indians v. Puckkee’s Empirical Analysis

321 F.2d 767 · 1963

Citation profile

68
cited by 68 later decisions
June 2005
most recently cited

54 federal appellate · 8 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 68 later decisions — most recently June 2005 · most notably Hamilton v. Nakai (1971), Prairie Band of the Pottawatomie Tribe of Indians v. Udall (1966)

54 federal appellate · 8 district ·

33019631970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gully v. First Nat. Bank in Meridian · Albert Shulthis v. D a McDougal · International Association of Machinists v. Central Airlines Inc · Williams v. Fanning · Metcalf v. City of Watertown

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(T)he fact that the suit involves the construction and effect of a federal judgment does not make it one arising under the federal law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “* * * the petitioner Potawatomi Nation, as created by the treaty of June 5, 17, 1846, and as it then existed, is entitled to an award for the benefit of all descendants of said Nation as it was constituted and recognized by the United States in said treaty, * * *.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “* * may be advanced or expended for any purpose that is authorized by the respective tribal governing bodies and approved by the Secretary of the Interior.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.