Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 321 F.2d 796 - Ballentine Motor Co., Inc., Ballentine's, and Ballentine Motors, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Ballentine Motor Co., Inc., Ballentine's, and Ballentine Motors, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue’s Empirical Analysis

321 F.2d 796 · 1963

Citation profile

69
cited by 69 later decisions
April 2009
most recently cited

17 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently April 2009 · most notably Foster v. Comm'r (1983), Nat Harrison Assoc., Inc. v. Commissioner (1964)

17 federal appellate ·

29019631970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 482

Relies on Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Duberstein D Stanton · United States v. Joliet & Chicago Railroad · Commissioner v. Chelsea Products, Inc. · The Paramount Finance Company v. The United States. Edward T. Kirtz and Rosalyn S. Kirtz v. The United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “His determination in this regard will be overturned only if shown by the taxpayer to have been arbitrary or unreasonable. A determination as to whether or not the Commissioner has exceeded or abused his discretion turns upon questions of fact and is subject to limited review.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “two or more organizations, trades, or businesses”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.