United States v. Jacques’s Empirical Analysis
321 F.3d 255 · 2003
Citation profile
14 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently April 2025 · most notably United States v. Torres-Aguilar (2003), United States v. Lucien (2003)
14 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3663 · 18 U.S.C. § 3664 · 42 U.S.C. § 1383A (§ 1632 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Roberts v. United States Jaycees · Johnson v. United States · Johnson v. United States · Houlihan, Lokey, Howard & Zukin, Inc. v. Circle K Corp. · United States v. Loy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) The defendant shall not commit another federal, state, or local crime. (2) The defendant shall not possess a firearm, destructive device, or any other dangerous weapon. (3) The defendant shall refrain from any unlawful use of a controlled substance. The defendant shall submit to one drug test within 15 days of release from imprisonment or placement on probation and at least two periodic drug tests thereafter. (4) The defendant shall not leave the judicial district without the permission of the court or probation officer; (5) The defendant shall report to the probation officer in a manner and frequency directed by the court or probation officer. (6) The defendant shall answer truthfully all inquiries by the probation officer and follow the instructions of the probation officer. (7) The defendant shall support his or her dependents and meet other family responsibilities. (8) The defendant shall work regularly at a lawful occupation, unless excused by the probation officer for schooling, training, or other acceptable reasons. (9) The defendant shall notify the probation officer at least ten days prior to any change in residence or employment or if such prior notification is not possible, then within forty-eight, hours after such change. (10) The defendant shall refrain from excessive use of alcohol and shall not purchase, possess, use, distribute, or administer, any controlled substance or any paraphernalia related to any controlled substances, except as prescribed by a phys”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“condition listed in subsection 5D1.3(d). And it clearly is not a basic requirement for the administration of supervised release. However, occupational restrictions are listed as item (4) in subsection 5D1.3(e). These subsection 5D1.3(e) conditions”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“neither mandatory under, nor specifically recommended by, the Guidelines and [was] not a basic requirement for the administration of supervised release.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.