Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 321 F.3d 266 - Nadel v. Isaksson

Nadel v. Isaksson’s Empirical Analysis

321 F.3d 266 · 2003

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
February 2018
most recently cited

10 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 35 U.S.C. § 102

Relies on Simblest v. Maynard · This Is Me, Inc. v. Taylor · Cruz v. Local Union No. 3 of International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[j]udgment as a matter of law may not properly be granted under Rule 50 unless the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the opposing party, is insufficient to permit a reasonable juror to find in her favor.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a district court must deny a motion for judgment as a matter of law unless ... there can be but one conclusion as to the verdict that reasonable persons could have reached.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “legally sufficient evidentiary basis for a reasonable jury to find for”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.