Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 321 F.3d 607 - United States v. Roche

United States v. Roche’s Empirical Analysis

321 F.3d 607 · 2003

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
July 2019
most recently cited

8 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Bradley v. United States · United States v. Leachman · United States v. Crousore · United States v. Harper · United States v. Aragon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Even if Roche had not been successful in obstructing justice by submitting the false documents, § 2J1.2(c) still would apply. Section 2J1.2(c), and its cross reference to § 2X3.1, apply equally to attempts to obstruct justice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[i]f the offense involved obstructing the investigation or prosecution of a criminal offense, apply § 2X3.1 (Accessory After the Fact) in respect to that criminal offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.