Jimenez v. Madison Area Technical College’s Empirical Analysis
321 F.3d 652 · 2003
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866)
Relies on Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp. · Fries v. Helsper · Pope v. Federal Express Corp. · Divane v. Krull Electric Co. · R.K. Harp Investment Corp. v. McQuade
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he filing of her baseless claim amounted to a veritable attack on our system of justice,. .. the only abuses ascertainable in this case were those committed by her counsel and [E.J.] herself.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the trial court has an intimate familiarity with the relevant proceedings [and] is better situated than the court of appeals to marshal the pertinent facts”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.