Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 321 F.3d 791 - Johnson v. California

Johnson v. California’s Empirical Analysis

321 F.3d 791 · 2003

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
March 2014
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Appellate journey

Relationships

Relies on Wolff v. McDonnell · Farmer v. Brennan · Turner v. Safley · Duncan v. Walker · SAUCIER v. KATZ Et Al.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “refute[] a commonsense connection between a legitimate objective and a prison regulation, ... the state must present enough counter-evidence to show that the connection is not so `remote as to render the policy arbitrary or irrational.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “When accommodation of an asserted right will have a significant `ripple effect' on fellow inmates or on prison staff, courts should be particularly deferential to the informed discretion of corrections officials.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “use of race [by the California Department of Corrections] in making initial housing assignments constitute[d] an impermissible racial classification afoul of the Equal Protection Clause.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.