Talbot v. Romney’s Empirical Analysis
1970
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1361 · 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 42 U.S.C. § 1441 (Housing Act of 1949)
Relies on Semmes Motors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co. · Core v. Norwalk Redevelopment Agency · 284 F. Supp. 809 - Powelton Civic Home Owners Ass'n Ex Rel. Hilburn Harbidge v. Department of Housing & Urban Development · 294 F. Supp. 433 - Western Addition Community Organization v. Weaver
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““projects planned for the renewal site encompassing said premises have been authorized by all appropriate governmental bodies and until such time as sponsors for said projects have adequately demonstrated their readiness, ability and willingness to proceed forthwith with the development of the renewal site.” Talbot v. Romney, supra at 471 (Order filed September 10, 1970).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Talbot v. Romney““Since the section [42 U.S.C. § 1455c] requires provision for the relocation of displaced families, it can hardly be thought that displaced families such as plaintiffs, do not have the required personal stake in the outcome of litigation where a violation of the section is claimed.” Id. at 932.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Talbot v. Romney
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.