Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 321 F. Supp. 85 - Felber v. Foote

321 F. Supp. 85 - Felber v. Foote’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
October 2014
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently October 2014

6 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

14019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1343 · 28 U.S.C. § 2281 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Katz v. United States · Mapp v. Ohio · Griswold v. State of Connecticut · Rochin v. People of California · Meyer v. State of Nebraska

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “general constitutional right to privacy.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Plaintiff further makes the unwarranted assumption that the special nature of the doctor-patient relationship affords him a constitutionally protected right to privacy in his conduct of the relationship. There is no "general constitutional right to privacy." Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347, 350 , 88 S.Ct. 507 , 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967). See Travers v. Paton, 261 F.Supp. 110 (D. Conn.1966). In Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 , 85 S.Ct. 1678 , 14 L.Ed.2d 510 (1965) the so-called right of privacy granted protection was the right of husband and wife to be let alone in the determination of family planning aspects of their marital relationship. There is not the slightest indication in the Griswold opinion that by its protection of the sanctity of the family, the Court intended to constitutionalize the privacy of other relationships, specifically that of physician and patient. (Felber v. Foote, filed Dec. 21, 1970, 321 F.Supp. 88, 89 ).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.