Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 321 FSUPP 937 - Jacobs v. Tenney

Jacobs v. Tenney’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
March 1983
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2283

Relies on J. I. Case Co. v. Borak · Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers · Toucey v. New York Life Insurance · Amalgamated Clothing Workers v. Richman Bros. · Studebaker Corporation v. Richard D. Gittlin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Any doubts as to the propriety of a federal injunction against state court proceedings should be resolved in favor of permitting the state courts to proceed in an orderly fashion to finally determine the controversy. The explicit wording of § 2283 itself implies as much, and the fundamental principle of a dual system of courts leads inevitably to that conclusion.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.