Cummings v. Murphy’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
December 2020
most recently cited
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1361 · 28 U.S.C. § 1651 · 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 5 U.S.C. § 2954
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Warth v. Seldin · Allen v. Wright · Flast v. Cohen · Powell v. McCormack
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[c]omplete vote nullification is clearly a type of institutional injury sufficient to support legislator standing”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“necessarily damage all Members of Congress and both Houses of Congress equally,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.