Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 321 GAAPP 314 - State v. Nicholson

State v. Nicholson’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Kelly · Ledford v. State · Cantrell v. State · Camphor v. State · O'NEAL v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “First, there must be an error or defect-some sort of deviation from a legal rule-that has not been intentionally relinquished or abandoned, i.e., affirmatively waived, by the appellant. Second, the legal error must be clear or obvious, rather than subject to reasonable dispute. Third, the error must have affected the appellant's substantial rights, which in the ordinary case means he must demonstrate that it affected the outcome of the trial court proceedings. Fourth and finally, if the above three prongs are satisfied, the appellate court has the discretion to remedy the error-discretion which ought to be exercised only if the error seriously affects the fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “remand this case to the trial court to consider the issues that were raised but not yet ruled upon.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.