Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 321 GAAPP 720 - Mullis v. State

Mullis v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Blockburger v. United States · Drinkard v. Walker · Rankin v. State · Long v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “whether each statutory provision requires proof of a fact which the other does not. If so, then two offenses exist, and one is not 'included in' the other.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “must therefore be vacated and the case remanded to the trial court for resentencing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Whether offenses merge is a legal question, which we review de novo.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.