Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 321 GAAPP 763 - Numanovic v. Jones

Numanovic v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 2025
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ferguson v. Composite State Board of Medical Examiners · In the Interest of A. C. · Avren v. Garten · Brewton v. Poss · Cloud v. Norwood

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Both OCGA §[§] 5-6-34 (a) and 5-6-35 (a) are involved when, as here, a trial court issues a judgment in a case covered by the direct appeal statute, but where the subject matter may also be covered under the discretionary appeal statute. Where both the direct and discretionary appeal statutes are implicated, it is always the underlying subject matter that will control whether the appeal must be brought pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-34 or OCGA § 5-6-35. 8”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.