Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 321 Ill. 612 - Beebe v. Kirkpatrick

Beebe v. Kirkpatrick’s Empirical Analysis

1926

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
6
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently March 2016 · most notably Pufahl v. Parks' Estate (1936), Weger v. Robinson Nash Motor Co. (1930)

36 state decisions

1701926193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Union Trust Co. v. Shoemaker · Ryan v. Jones · Elgin National Bank v. Goecke · Holm v. Jamieson · Gridley v. Capen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In' this State contracts of guaranty of negotiable instruments are of two kinds: contracts guaranteeing the collection of the notes, and contracts guaranteeing the payment of the notes. A contract guaranteeing the collection of a note or debt is conditional in its character, and the guarantor thereby undertakes to pay the debt upon condition that the owner thereof shall makq use of the ordinary legal means to collect it from the debtor with diligence but without avail. A contract guaranteeing the payment of a note or a debt is an absolute contract, and by it the guarantor undertakes, for a valuable consideration, to pay the debt at maturity if the principal debtor fails to do so, and upon it, if the debt is not paid at maturity, the guarantor may be sued at once.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.