Greisinger v. Klinhardt’s Empirical Analysis
1928
Citation profile
44 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2005 · most notably United States v. Kansas City Life Insurance (1950), Natural Soda Products Co. v. City of Los Angeles (1943)
44 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cheever v. Hodgson · Mendota Club v. Anderson · Eliason v. Grove · Blum v. Weston · Toothe v. Bryce
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Where the owner of land has, by any artificial arrangement, effected an advantage for one portion, to the burdening of the other, upon a severance of the ownership the holders of the two portions take them respectively charged with the servitude and entitled to the benefit openly and visibly attached at the time of the conveyance of the portion first granted.” That principle applies to ways, lateral support, and riparian rights (quoting Hall v. Morton, 125 Mo.App. 315 , 102 S.W. 570 (1907)) (citations omitted).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Marshall v. Spangler“[r]iparian rights are not confined to navigable waters.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.