Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 321 N.C. 541 - State v. Squire

State v. Squire’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
4
states following
December 2014
most recently cited

44 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently December 2014 · most notably State v. Sexton (1994), State v. Bogle (1989)

44 state decisions

2601988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Angelini · United States v. Hewitt · State v. Hairston · State v. McCormick · State v. . Laxton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Thus, in determining whether evidence of a character trait is admissible under Rule 404(a)(1), the trial court must determine whether the trait in question is relevant; i.e., whether it would “make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action” more or less probable than it would be without evidence of the trait.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “relevant in the context of the crime charged.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “(a) Character evidence generally.— Evidence of a person's character or a trait of his character is not admissible for the purpose of proving that he acted in conformity therewith on a particular occasion, except: (1) Character of accused.—Evidence of a pertinent trait of his character offered by an accused, or by the prosecution to rebut the same[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.