State v. Dominguez-Martinez’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
3
states following
September 2003
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"It also is clear * * * that an officer who stops a person for a traffic infraction may investigate only that infraction, unless the state can point to some basis other than the traffic infraction to broaden the scope of the investigation."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“"The trooper's authority to detain the two men dissipated when he completed the investigation `reasonably related to the traffic infraction * * * and issuance of citation.' ORS 810.410(3)(b). Thus, as in [ State v.] Farley, [ 308 Or. 91 , 775 P.2d 835 (1989),] the officer's authority to detain defendant under the statute had dissipated, and the men should have `been allowed to proceed' without further detention. Accordingly, the trooper exceeded his authority to stop and detain a motorist in order to conduct a traffic investigation under ORS 810.410(3)."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“"[A]t the same time that the trooper was telling [the car's occupants] that they were free to go, he stood in the [car's] open doorway, and defendant could not have driven away. The trooper immediately began to question [the occupants] about narcotics trafficking and illegal weapons." 321 Or. at 213 , 895 P.2d 306 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.