Brentmar v. Jackson County’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2011
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"(2) In counties that have adopted marginal lands provisions under ORS 197.247 (1991 Edition), the following uses may be established in any area zoned for exclusive farm use subject to ORS 215.296[ [4] ]:”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) A use allowed under ORS 215.213(2) * * * may be approved only where the local governing body or its designee finds that the use will not: "(a) Force a significant change in accepted farm or forest practices on surrounding lands devoted to farm or forest use; or "(b) Significantly increase the cost of accepted farm or forest practices on surrounding lands devoted to farm or forest use.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“"(e) Community centers owned and operated by a governmental agency or a nonprofit community organization, hunting and fishing preserves, parks, playgrounds and campgrounds.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.