Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 321 Or. 99 - Holcomb v. Sunderland

Holcomb v. Sunderland’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently April 2018

20 state decisions

120199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The 1989 and 1993 revisions to the sentencing statutes now make it clear that a judgment of probation is the imposition of a sentence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “becomes part of the statute as if it were written into the law at the time of its enactment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he proper inquiry focuses on what the legislature intended at the time of enactment and discounts later events”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.