Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

321 Or. App. 210

State v. Gross

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 3, 2022

This page is marked noindex.

Court of Appeals of Oregon · decided 2022-08-03

Applies OR 161 § 161.605 · OR 163 § 163.160

Remanded for resentencing · Decided 2022-08-03

                                  210

   This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion
    pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited
         except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).
     Submitted July 1; remanded for resentencing, otherwise affirmed
                            August 3, 2022


                   STATE OF OREGON,
                    Plaintiff-Respondent,
                              v.
                CLIFFORD DUANE GROSS,
                   Defendant-Appellant.
                Umatilla County Circuit Court
                   20CR61014; A175767

  Christopher R. Brauer, Judge.
  Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate
Section, and Kyle Krohn, Deputy Public Defender, Office of
Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.
   Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman,
Solicitor General, and Lauren P. Robertson, Assistant
Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
  Before Tookey, Presiding Judge, and Egan, Judge, and
Kamins, Judge.
  PER CURIAM
  Remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.
Nonprecedential Memo Op: 
321 Or App 210
 (2022)            211

        PER CURIAM
         Defendant appeals a judgment convicting him of
fourth-degree assault constituting domestic violence, ORS
163.160(3), a Class C felony. The trial court imposed a
sentence of 38 months’ imprisonment to be followed by 24
months of post-prison supervision. Defendant asserts that
the sentence that the trial court imposed constitutes plain
error because the combined incarceration term and post-prison supervision term exceed the statutory maximum for
the offense, which carries a maximum indeterminate sentence of five years. ORS 161.605(3). See also OAR 213-005-
0002(4) (“The term of post-prison supervision, when added
to the prison term, shall not exceed the statutory maximum
indeterminate sentence for the crime of conviction.”). The
state concedes that the trial court committed plain error in
imposing that sentence. We agree and accept the state’s concession. Further, because the gravity of the error to defendant is significant, we exercise our discretion to correct the
error.
        Remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.

/321/orapp/210 · .json · Public domain